Tuesday, November 27, 2007

Man, This Is Smart! A Windows Infection That Gives Remote Control to The Hacker!

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us
We've seen similar infections in the past, but since this is pretty new, it might manage to bypass the antivirus protection and install on your computer. Security company Trend Micro discovered BKDR_DARKMOON.AH, a new backdoor affecting the Windows operating systems which attempts to open a port in order to allow the hacker to connect to
your computer. Basically, it can open any port it wants and, since there are so many remote control technologies available out there, it can easily allow its creator to control your system.

The backdoor affects most Windows versions including Windows 98, ME, NT, 2000, XP, Server 2003. But what's more important is that it has a high damage potential bundled with a medium distribution potential. Sure, it has a low overall risk rating, but it's still dangerous for our computers since it provides remote access to the attackers.

"This backdoor may be dropped by other malware. It opens a random port to allow a remote user to connect to the affected system. Once a successful connection is established, the remote user executes commands on the affected system", Trend Micro wrote in the advisory.

"Upon execution, this backdoor injects itself into the Internet Explorer process and sets up an obfuscated connection to [website], which currently resolves to [IP], to notify a remote user of the system it has compromised."

Since the backdoor is pretty new, there are no infections reported. However, you're still advised to keep your antivirus up-to-date with the latest virus definitions and avoid visiting malicious websites coming from unknown sources.

Most of the antivirus developers quickly update their solutions to provide support and disinfection for the reported threats so that you are protected as soon as possible. In case you don't have an antivirus solution installed on your computer, you can get one straight from Softpedia by visiting our Antivirus category.

Toshiba and Nec, Hand in Hand for 32 nm Chips

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

The leading chip manufacturers on the Japanese market, Toshiba and Nec have recently announced their joint project to develop competitive 32-nanometer chip in order to maintain a tight competition on the chips market.

This would not be the first partnership between the two semiconductor industry giants,
as they have been working closely to achieve 45nm process technology development since February 2006. The 32 nanometer project will work as an extension of the previous partnership at the same location, namely Toshiba's Advanced Microelectronics Center in Yokohama. The companies have teamed up to share the amount of work as well as production costs.

The chip industry is struggling to shrink the actual circuit sizes in order to keep low costs per chip and to provide electronic equipment with an increased functioning time when using batteries. These objectives, however, have impact over materials and the whole production process, which translates into huge investments for starting mass production. Global semiconductor companies fight these costs by creating joint ventures, just like Toshiba and Nec.

The competition is harsh, as Samsung Electronics, IBM, Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing, Infineon Technologies, STMicroelectronics and Freescale Semiconductor have announced that they are working on achieving the 32-nanometer chips until 2010.

The joint venture will start producing 45-nanometer or 40-nanometer chips until 2009, and will try to add Fujitsu as partner. However, spokesman Etsuro Yamada declined to comment on whether or not Fujitsu would join the group, but managed to say that Fujitsu was taking into consideration all the aspects of adhering to the joint venture.

Producing 32-nanometer chips will require a complete change in the companies' equipments, such as immersion steppers that use purified water, silicon wafers to draw the circuitry over microchips as well as other logistic changes. The companies would have to invest more than 100-200 billion yen before they are able to produce the first 32-nanometer chip.

Guide to Connecting the Xbox 360 to Windows Vista Media Center PC

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

First of all, those attempting to connect their Xbox 360 to the PC will need to install the Rollup 2 update in MCE2005 and download the software from the URL the Xbox 360 brings up when trying to connect. If you're using Windows
Firewall, you don't need to turn it off, as it will adjust itself automatically. Actually, just don't turn it off, period! If you're using a 3rd party firewall, click here for a solution.

Steps

1. Be sure your 360 isn't paired up with any other PC. To do this, go to your 360 dashboard and browse to the System blade, then Computers. Disconnect from any computers listed there.

2. Boot your Windows Vista PC up and leave it sitting on the desktop.

3. On your 360, browse to the "Media Blade" and select "Windows Media Center". Alternatively, press the green MCE button if you have a remote.

4. You will be presented with an 8 digit number. Write it down or memorize it, and go back to your PC.

5. If you're in "Media Center", you should see the Window prompting you for the numbers. If you're not, then a pop-up balloon will appear from your system tray, near the clock.

6. Enter the numbers required, then set your options for folder sharing. Select the folders you have media in.

7. Let it do its thing. Once finished, it should automatically launch MCE on the 360.

TRANSCODE 360
Transcode 360 allows you to stream unsupported formats to your Xbox 360 console. Microsoft allows very few formats through, but there's a way you can stream them by using this software.

You can download the Transcode360 utility software right HERE

Requirements:
Windows Media Center, either Vista or XP MCE 2005
A computer that's reasonably quick. I can transcode with a laptop that has a Pentium M 1.4GHZ and a GB of Ram.
Vista Codec Pack (including FFDshow)

Steps

1. Install the codec pack with default settings.
2. Install Transcode360, using default settings. REBOOT YOUR PC
3. If you get an error after the reboot, you'll need to turn UAC off. This is a pain with Vista, as you can't specify the application to bypass UAC (that I know of).
4. If you run Avast Anti-Virus, check here
5. Once you have no issues after reboots, you're ready to go.

Run "Media Center" on your 360 and browse to the movie you want to watch (can include ISO images). Press "B" on your controller, or "Info" on the remote, which brings up a menu. Select "More", then "Transcode". Wait a few seconds (depending on the speed of your PC), and the movie should start!

The information above was available courtesy of jimmy_Bish up on the Xbox 360 forums.

Softpedia doesn't encourage the use of incompatible hardware with the Xbox 360 console from Microsoft, or any software or parts that the company hasn't confirmed as suitable for use with the respective console.

Apple Already Giving Out iPhone SDKs?

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Everyone knows that the iPhone SDK is still months away from being released, and the only people doing anything with it at the moment are the Apple employees that are working on it, right? It seems that might not be the case as Electronista reports that its sources have caught wind of Apple releasing early versions of the SDK to prominent developers.

Apple needs to balance out both security and a robust development platform, which will take a couple of months… we’ve all heard the company’s
official statements on the topic. But is it any surprise that Apple would start giving early version of the SDK out to major developers that it is on good terms with? Hardly.

While regular developers will have to wait until next year, a handful of big companies can already start using rough version of the tools in order to code more complex applications than the current web-only offerings.

Although the Electronista report does not give out specific details, it does mention that the SDK does indeed produce native applications, and that it also mediates between the programmer and the iPhone operating system, in a manner similar to Google's OpenSocial. Thus, writing applications for the iPhone will be quite different from writing applications for OS X, with very clear limitations, but still be a lot more flexible than the current approach to the problem.

Although both the companies that have received the SDK, as well as possible projects they might be working have not been disclosed, one thing is very clear. These big time developers will likely already have their applications ready for launch the second Apple is ready to release the SDK, well ahead of the normal developers all over the world. While undoubtedly this is a blow to the very people that have made the Mac platform what it is today with their plethora of applications, the move does make sense from a business point of view. Apple can cement their relationships with various other big companies through this early start, as well as have a bunch of applications ready on launch day to show the world what wonders can be accomplished with the new SDK. Hopefully, someone at Apple was smart enough to select one or two established, long-time Mac developers for the early SDK, as a gesture of good will.

Windows XP SP3 Twice as Fast as Windows Vista – Leaves Vista SP1 in the Dust

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us
Forget about Windows Vista. And forget about Windows Vista SP1. Microsoft's latest Windows client has been quite sluggish to begin with. This in both consumer adoption and in terms of the performance it delivers. As the operating system was crawling along, while performing the most common of tasks, even "speed bumps" seemed an integer part of the road's landscape. Right, that was uncalled for... But still, even on its best day, Vista is slow, and the first service pack for the operating system will change nothing in this aspect. Windows XP SP3 simply flies in comparison to Vista, SP1 or no SP1.

Benchmark testing delivered by the researchers at Devil Mountain Software, a software-development
company based in Florida, revealed that Windows XP SP3 is twice as fast as Windows Vista, with or without SP1 installed. The company threw the two operating systems one against the other on the following configuration: Dell XPS M1710, 2GHz Core 2 Duo CPU, 1GB of RAM and nVidia GeForce Go 7900GS video. While Vista SP1 delivered minor and disappointing growth in performance, XP SP3 faired quite well.
"Windows XP Service Pack 3 (v.3244) delivers a measurable performance boost to this aging desktop OS. Testing with OfficeBench showed an ~10% performance boost vs. the same configuration running under Windows XP w/Service Pack 2. XP SP3 is shaping-up to be a "must have" update for the majority of users who are still running Redmond's not-so-latest and greatest desktop OS. Of course, none of this bodes well for Vista, which is now more than 2x slower than the most current builds of its older sibling", revealed a member of Devil Mountain Sofware.

Windows XP SP3 finished the OfficeBench test in approximately 35 seconds, XP SP2 went over 40 seconds with Vista RTM and Vista SP1 both exceeding 80 seconds. The company then added another GB of RAM. Moreover, they also tested Vista in tandem with Office 2007 instead of Office 2003. But while Vista dropped under the 80 seconds milestone it still doesn't even come close to the performance of XP. Commenting the benchmarking Microsoft explained that both Vista SP1 and XP SP3 are still under development and as such, not delivering a complete experience. Vista SP1 is currently planned for the first quarter of next year, while XP has been announced by mid 2008.

"By providing Vista (SP1) with an additional 1GB of RAM (that's a total of 2GB for those of you keeping score) we managed to achieve a "whopping" 4% improvement in OfficeBench throughput. Moving from Office 2007 to Office 2003 definitely improved Vista's showing. Instead of being over 2x slower than XP on the same OfficeBench workload, Vista is now "only" 1.8x slower", the Devil Mountain Software added.

The Satechi Bluetooth FM Transmitter: Cheapo, iPod and Zune Compatible

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us
Bluetooth has become one of the most popular data transfer and voice communication technologies around, one of the reasons of its popularity being related to its ease of integration. Thus, the number of Bluetooth-enabled devices available on the market is absolutely huge, ranging from mice to headphones via, quite obviously, such handhelds as mobile phones and PDAs.
One relatively recent addition to this list is represented by FM transmitters, much like the device you're about to see as follows, namely the Satechi Bluetooth FM Transmitter; it can route both the voice calls and the music stored onto the user's portable devices directly through his/her car audio system.

The device from Satechi is a Class 2 Bluetooth device, compliant with the V 1.1/1.2/2.0 specifications and providing an overall functioning range of around 30 feet (10 meters). Furthermore, it supports the Bluetooth A2DP (Advance Audio Distribution) profile, which can prove to be quite helpful for broadcasting music, and incorporates DSP (Digital Signal Processing) to cancel echo and reduce ambient noise.

Moreover, the FM transmitter is compatible with every Bluetooth-enabled phone on the market and provides quite a high level of versatility, since its audio input also supports additional music players, as for example the iPod, the Zune or other generic models.

As expected, this thing is not exactly very bulky, measuring just around 3 x 1.5 x 1 inches (7.62 cm x 3.81 cm x 2.54 cm), at a weight of just around 1 pound (453 grams). Furthermore, it doesn't require any batteries, since it's powered directly by the car's cigarette lighter adapter.

The Satechi Bluetooth FM Transmitter - box shot
As mentioned right from the beginning of this article, one of the most important selling points of the Bluetooth FM Transmitter from Satechi is its price. Thus, the device retails for around 100 US dollars, which is not a very small price, but it's in any case more affordable than most of the similar devices available on the market, which will most likely make it quite popular among those users who would like to enjoy the features of a Bluetooth handsfree system, without coughing up quite a large amount of money.

Sequence “Experiment Auto-Complete” Started For Many

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us
Google has decided to let the world join in and lend a helping hand with feedback for its various user experience improving programs. Today, it’s about the auto-complete option that one and all can turn on for the search engine’s homepage.

All you need to do for this to happen is to visit
the Experimental Search homepage and click on the "Join this experiment" button right next to the "Keyword suggestions" section. Auto complete will then be switched on and you will see the search box expand to a list of popular queries as you type.

Useful, I know, not unique, rather behind on time, but welcome nonetheless. Some countries have this option by default, such as China; but users in many other countries will have to go through the above process in order to see its "beneficial" effects. For example, Yahoo! has recently gone the same path and launched its very own auto-complete feature, but it looks so much neater than what Google is offering right now. It has a special box divided in half, for the queries formed with the letters typed in and the second for a potential future word that matches a previous query. It also doesn’t stress you right away with the drop-down list, but it waits for you to pause for a couple of moments in typing and only then it does its thing.

I've just joined this experiment and the one thing it has more than Yahoo!’s equivalent of it is the number of matches it finds, displayed in the right. That’s something like Google Trends, if I may compare the two. A good tool to have at your disposal when you have to type in complicated words or names (especially Nordic ones, I find those rather difficult), or when you’re in a hurry. Except for that… eh… what can I say, it might as well not have been there as far as I’m concerned.

How About A Virus That Restarts Your Computer?

WORM_BRONTOK.CE is a new worm discovered by security company Trend Micro which confirmed that the infection affects most Windows versions including 98, ME, NT, 2000, XP, Server 2003. Although the worm has a medium damage potential and a medium distribution potential, there are no reported infections yet. In case you're wondering how you can get infected, you should know that WORM_BRONTOK.CE can be deployed by other infections or straight by the users who visit malicious pages. The installation is done without
their approval so there's no way to find out if you're infected in case you don't have an antivirus. But what's more important is that the threat aims to harm several file formats in order to be sure that it is executed on the victim's computer.

"Upon execution, this worm drops the following files. This worm creates registry entries to enable its automatic execution at every system startup. It also modifies registry entries in order to execute itself every time a .EXE, .COM, .PIF, or .BAT file is run," Trend Micro noted in the security advisory.

In addition to these affected file extensions, the worm attempts to reboot the computer every time a certain string is detected in the Internet Explorer title bar. This way, the affected consumers can get their systems restarted every time they visit certain websites. "This worm restarts the affected system when it finds an open window containing certain strings in the title bar of Internet Explorer (IE)," Trend Micro explained.

Moreover, the infection uses the Windows folder icon to hide its files from the users. "It also uses the Windows folder icon to trick affected users into thinking that it is a normal or legitimate folder. Once clicked, it opens the My Documents folder to hide its execution routines."

Just like several other Windows infections, WORM_BRONTOK.CE attempts to spread itself by installing on every removable drive connected to an infected computer. The propagation is done through an Autorun.inf file dropped on every removable device which is used to infect clean computers and execute the worm.
Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

ATI FireGL V7600 512 MB Workstation Graphics Card

ATI’s FireGL brand of workstation-class graphics cards have played second fiddle to NVIDIA's offerings for some time now. NVIDIA’s rival Quadro lineup has been an incredibly strong competitor, and combined with the fact that the last several FireGL card releases have suffered from late arrival dates and lackluster performance by the time they hit the market, NVIDIA has been able to get a solid foothold in this market. However, with the power of the R600 graphics processor under the hood, ATI has introduced a new lineup of workstation cards which are giving NVIDIA a run for their money in terms of price/performance metrics. The R600 may not have been a tremendous hit for the gaming market, but in a workstation environment, the power of this GPU can be harnessed in a much different way.
Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.usFree Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us
Today in hand, we have the new FireGL V7600 512MB workstation graphics card. This card is based on the same basic board design as the Radeon HD 2900 lineup for gamers, but is tweaked on both the hardware and software level for enhanced workstation performance. The card is the least costly of ATI’s FireGL lineup based on the R600 GPU, and currently retails for just south of $1,000. At this time, Nvidia has nothing directly competing against this product at that price point, which gives ATI an opportunity to strike for workstation users who want a high-end workstation card at a price tag under four digits. We’ve heard rumors of upcoming products from Nvidia which will directly target this card, but for now, the FireGL V7600 owns its specific price point.

The closest competitor, from a price perspective, is Nvidia’s QuadroFX 4500 card, which can currently be had online for $800 - $1,000. While the QuadroFX 4500 is a solid competitor, it’s been on the market for several years, and doesn’t support some newer technologies like Shader Model 4.0 (DirectX 10). However, in the workstation market, where OpenGL is still king, this feature matters very little. The driving factors for workstation buyers are still raw OpenGL graphics performance, clean drivers, industry certifications, memory capacity, and overall value. In its market, the FireGL V7600 looks very strong. Let’s take a closer look at the actual product.
Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

"Introducing the ATI FireGL V7600 workstation graphics accelerators from AMD with Unified Shader architecture - this fully featured graphics accelerator is ideal for maximizing productivity when working with complex 3D models and intense textures for Computer Aided Design (CAD), Digital Content Creation (DCC) and simulation. The ATI FireGL V7600 delivers industry leading features and performance at an affordable price."

* ATI R600 Graphics Processing Unit

* 512 MB of GDDR-3 Memory

* 256-bit Ringbus Memory Controller

* 35 GB/s Memory Bandwidth

* 507 MHz GPU Clock Speed

* 320 Steam Processors

* Shader Model 4.0 and OpenGL 2.0 Support



* PCI Express x16 Connector

* 8-pin PCI Express Power Connector

* Dual Slot Copper Heatpipe Cooling System

* Thermally Controlled Integrated Blower Fan

* Two Dual-Link DVI Output Ports

* 3-pin Stereoscopic Output Connector

* Crossfire 2.0 Multi-GPU Connectors

The FireGL V7600 uses the same massive R600 core used in the Radeon HD 2900 lineup, which has an (estimated) 420mm2 die size, is comprised of over 700 million transistors, and is based on an 80nm manufacturing process. The V7600 runs at a far lower clock speed, however, as ATI’s utilities report the card operates at a 507 MHz core frequency, compared to the 750 MHz+ clock speeds at which their gaming-targeted R600 products run. Unfortunately, all of the available software-level utilities to try to pinpoint exact clock speeds would not work with the V7600 card, which also kept us from overclocking the card. Keep in mind this is a workstation card though, so the percentage of those actually overclocking a card like this is slim to none.

The board is equipped with 512 MB of GDDR-3 memory which is connected to a 256-bit memory controller. ATI’s documentation is conflicted on overall memory bandwidth of this card, as their reviewers guide claims it has 35 GB/s whereas their website says over 50 GB/s. ATI’s software tools claim that the clock speed of the DDR memory is a mere 513 MHz (x2 DDR), which matches up closer to 35 GB/s rather than 51 GB/s.
The V7600 uses the same Catalyst Control Center that most ATI users are familiar with. We did not see any specific FireGL functionality in the driver set. ATI does not publically have FireGL V7600 drivers on their website, so we had to use the bundled drivers that came with our sample board.

One aspect which we feel is worth noting is that the FireGL V7600 does not have 64-bit drivers readily available at this time. We were forced to run our tests under a 32-bit operating system, although when we tried to run this card in a 64-bit operating system, we realized that there simply aren’t any Vista or XP x64 drivers available from ATI. We think it’s quite likely that someone buying a $1,000 graphics card will also be running 4GB of memory and will likely use a 64-bit operating system, so potential buyers might want to keep this in mind. We’re certain that they will be adding 64-bit support soon, but as of now, x64 users are out of luck.

3M Announces 46-inch (1.16-meter) Touch Screens!

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us
Touch screens represent the future of control systems, but, unfortunately, most devices of this type available on the market have relatively small sizes. Nevertheless, it would seem that things are about to change, since 3M has just announced that it will be releasing very early next year a series of touch screens with sizes of up to 46 inches
(1.16 meters).

Thus, the new MicroTouch DST touch screens will be available in 32-inch, 40-inch, 42-inch and 46-inch screen sizes to integrators across Europe. Based on 3M’s patented Dispersive Signal Technology (DST), MicroTouch DST touch screens offer integrators a very good solution for large-format interactive displays in most public environments and applications, including digital signage, retail point-of-sale, point-of-information, conference rooms and education presentation systems.

As the company informs us, Dispersive Signal Technology recognizes touch by interpreting bending waves within the glass substrate created by the contact of a finger or stylus on the glass. Since bending waves are unaffected by on-screen contaminants and moderate surface damage, DST touch screens are inherently robust making them a compelling solution for customers in many of today’s high productivity, vertical applications.

"DST touch screens offer unique qualities not available from existing large format touch solutions," commented Francesco Fasoglio, European Business Manager, 3M Touch Systems. "In addition to offering fast, accurate and reliable touch response, and exceptional light transmission, the touch screens are easy to integrate. They have no front surface components to impede bezel integration, they are easily sealable, and feature chemically-strengthened glass to ensure operation is unaffected by surface contaminants. Furthermore, their "dynamic touch" feature ignores static objects on the screen to allow for multi-user touch capabilities."

According to 3M, the new touch screens will be available starting January 1st 2008, although no pricing details have been revealed for the time being.

BitDefender Antivirus 2008 Hits US

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us
BitDefender Internet Security 2008 and BitDefender Antivirus 2008, two popular security technologies, are now available to the residents of the United States through OfficeMax and its 860 retail stores across the country. BitDefender is one of the top solutions when it comes
to computer security as it offers numerous products supposed to keep a safe and secure system.

For example, the Internet Security suite includes everything a user needs starting with comprehensive protection against viruses, spyware or spam and ending with offline backup features and system maintenance tools. "Additional features include improved Internet application control, adaptive filtering, heuristic web filtering, as well as a set-up wizard that simplifies installation", it is mentioned in a press release signed by the security vendor.

"As part of our continuing efforts to provide consumers with the best available antivirus software and data security solutions, we are pleased that our software will now be available through OfficeMax in the U.S.," stated Kirk Matsuo, BitDefender’s director of retail sales. "This allows us to widen our reach throughout the United States while providing a simple-to-use solution to those searching for the most advanced protection against the threats encountered in today’s online activities, as well as protection against threats that may appear at any moment."

The official page of OfficeMax sells the BitDefender Antivirus for $39.99, while the BitDefender Internet Security suite can be bought for no less than $59.99.

In case you didn't know, BitDefender is one of the technologies compatible with Windows Vista, the latest operating system rolled out by the Redmond software giant Microsoft. Although it was supposed to be the most secure OS designed by Microsoft, most users prefer to install additional security utilities to enhance the protection of the application. BitDefender is one of these so if you want to buy it, now you know where to find it.

Samsung Spinpoint F1 – One Terabyte, Three Platters

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us
The storage industry has undoubtedly undergone a fascinating evolution this year. We have seen the 250 GB notebook hard drive hit the shelves, as well as we have witnessed the first 3.5'' one terabyte hard disk drive. Most of all, the new technology is already mass-produced, with affordable prices for the consumer market. Until now, Hitachi, Seagate and Western Digital have managed to carry capacity above 1 TB. It is now time for Samsung
to join the four aces club.

The first to surpass the gigabyte barrier was Hitachi GST with their Deskstar 7K1000. The disk used five platters storing 200 GB each, but as the number of mobile parts increased, so did power consumption and noise levels.

The next to penetrate the terbayte market was Western Digital's Caviar Green Power (GP), that compressed one terabyte on four platters only. Although the disc spins at 5400 RPM, Western Digital compensates the rotational handicap with a more compact design.

Seagate came the third into the terabyte-disc producing elite, but it is worth the waiting, because Seagate's Barracuda 7200.11 is the fastest 3.5" SATA drive on the market. The disc also uses four platters for 1TB of storage, but thanks to the full speed 7,200 RPM spindle, the drive is able to deliver a transfer rate of 100 MB/s.

Samsung has announced their entry in the one-terabyte disk manufacturers elite. Unlike their predecessors, Samsung has approached the terabyte threshold using only three platters, which makes it not only faster than the competition's, but also more economical in terms of absorbed power. Samsung can also speculate new opportunities by delivering single-platter hard drives up to 320 GB with a minimal investment in materials and production costs. The other manufacturers are still nailed down by the maximum 250 GB storage capacity per platter.

Unfortunately, Samsung's architecture does not support upgrades. It would have been logical for Samsung to add a fourth platter get a smashing 1.35 TB hard drive, but unfortunately, this is not possible. While other manufacturers are using 50-millimeter thick platters, Samsung has adopted the 68-millimeter format that increases resistance against vibrations. A fourth platter merely would not fit the hard disk case.